Our good friend, Ron Moore, Esquire writes us “I actu­ally had a client research­ing lawyers who looked at the Truth About Foren­sic Sci­ence geek of the week posts and liked my answers. It made a dif­fer­ence in who he decided to hire. Thanks!” So, there is a lot of value in www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week Chal­lenge. Try it out today.

Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week

Forensic Science Geek of the Week
Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week

Thanks to the com­bined inspi­ra­tion of Chris­tine Funk, Esquire and Chuck Ram­say, Esquire, a new twist of this blog is being intro­duced. A weekly fun foren­sic sci­ence challenge/trivia ques­tion. The win­ner will be affec­tion­ately dubbed “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week.”

Rules:

  1. The chal­lenge will be posted Sun­day morn­ing 12 noon EST.
  2. Answers to the chal­lenge will be entered by respond­ing to this blog post or thewww.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Face­Book fan page.
  3. All com­ments that are answers to this blog will released after 9pm EST.
  4. The first com­plete and cor­rect answer will be awarded the envi­ous title of “www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week”
  5. www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week” is enti­tled a one time post of his/her pic­ture on this blog and the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Face­Book fan page. The cov­eted title will be his/her for that week. Addi­tion­ally, a win­ner will be allowed one link to one web­page of his/her choice. Both the pic­ture and the weblink is sub­ject to the approval of Justin J McShane, Esquire and will only be screened for appro­pri­ate taste.
  6. The win­ner will be announced Sun­day night.
  7. A win­ner may only repeat two times in a row, then will have to sit out a week to be eli­gi­ble again. This per­son, who was the two time in a row win­ner, may answer the ques­tion, but will be dis­qual­i­fied from the honor so as to allow oth­ers to participate.
  8. This is for learn­ing and for fun. EVERYONE IS ENCOURAGED TO TRY TO ANSWER THE WEEKLY QUESTION. So give it a shot.

Here it is:

The www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com “Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week” chal­lenge ques­tion. Remem­ber the first full and com­plete answer wins the honor and also gets his/her photo dis­played, brag­ging rights for the week and finally web­site promotion.

OFFICIAL QUESTION:

Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week Challenge

1. What is reported in this picture?

2. Are there known issues with the method of test­ing, if so what, if not, why not?

The Hall of Fame for the www.TheTruthAboutForensicScience.com Foren­sic Sci­ence Geek of the Week:

Week 1: Chuck Ram­say, Esquire

Week 2: Rick McIn­doe, PhD

Week 3: Chris­tine Funk, Esquire

Week 4: Stephen Daniels

Week 5: Stephen Daniels

Week 6: Richard Mid­dle­brook, Esquire

Week 7: Chris­tine Funk, Esquire

Week 8: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 9: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 10: Kelly Case, Esquire and Michael Dye, Esquire

Week 11: Brian Man­ches­ter, Esquire

Week 12: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 13: Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 14: Josh D, Lee, Esquire

Week 15: Joshua Dale, Esquire and Steven W. Her­nan­dez, Esquire

Week 16: Chris­tine Funk, Esquire

Week 17: Joshua Dale, Esquire

Week 18: Glen Nee­ley, Esquire

Week 19: Amanda Bynum, Esquire

Week 20: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 21: Glen Nee­ley, Esquire

Week 22:  Stephen Daniels

Week 23:  Ron Moore, B.S., J.D.

Week 24: Bobby Spinks

Week 25:  Jon Woolsey, Esquire

Week 26: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 27: Richard Mid­dle­brook, Esquire

Week 28:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 29: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 30: C. Jef­frey Sifers, Esquire

Week 31: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 32: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 33: Andy Johnston

Week 34: Ralph R. Ris­ten­batt, III

Week 35: Brian Man­ches­ter, Esquire

Week 36: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 37: Jef­frey Benson

Week 38: Pam King, Esquire

Week 39: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 40: Robert Lantz, Ph.D.

WEEK 41: UNCLAIMED, IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 42: Steven W. Her­nan­dez, Esquire

Week 43:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 44: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 45: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 46:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 47:Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 48: Leslie M. Sam­mis, Esquire

Week 49: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 50: Jef­fery Benson

Week 51: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 52: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 53: Eric Ganci, Esquire

Week 54: Charles Sifers, Esquire and Tim Huey, Esquire

Week 55: Joshua Andor, Esquire

Week 56: Brian Man­ches­ter, Esquire

Week 57: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 58: Eric Ganci, Esquire

Week 59: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 60: Brian Man­ches­ter, Esquire

Week 61: William Her­ringer, Esquire

Week 62: UNCLAIMED IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 63: Gin­ger Moss

Week 64: Richard L. Hol­comb, Esquire

Week 65: John L. Buck­ley, Esquire

Week 66: Jeff Sifers, Esquire

Week 67: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 68: Dr. Bar­bara Von­der­haar, PhD.

Week 69: Chris­tine Funk, Esquire

Week 70: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 71: Ron Moore, Esquire

Week 72: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 73: Josh D. Lee, Esquire

Week 74: Kim Kehe­ley Frye, Esquire

Week 75: Mehul B. Anjaria and Peter Carini, Esquire

Week 76: Kim Kehe­ley Frye, Esquire

Week 77: Mehul B. Anjaria

Week 78: Steven W. Her­nan­dez, Esquire

Week 79: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 8o: Justin Har­ris, Esquire

Week 81: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 82: Jay Tiftick­jian, Esquire

Week 83: UNCLAIMED. IT COULD BE YOU!

Week 84: Steven W. Her­nan­dez, Esquire

Week 85: Pat Arata, Esquire

 

1 Response » to “The Week 86 Forensic Science Geek of the Week Challenge”

  1. 1. This is a dia­gram demon­strat­ing the results of a “pos­i­tive” paraf­fin test show­ing the pres­ence of nitrates. Given the date and descrip­tion, it is most likely from the right hand of Lee Har­vey Oswald.

    2. In 1933, Teodoro Gon­za­lez of the Crim­i­nal Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion Lab­o­ra­tory in the Mex­ico City intro­duced this test into the United States. The test was con­ducted by apply­ing melted paraf­fin to an individual’s hand(s), allow­ing it to cool, then remov­ing the solid­i­fied paraf­fin casts. The casts were then treated with dipheny­lamine and diphenyl­ben­zi­dine. Nitrates would then show up as blue or vio­let dots in the cast. At one time, this was thought to be con­clu­sive for the pres­ence of nitrates and nitrites orig­i­nat­ing from gun­pow­der; how­ever, it has since been shown that nitrates and nitrites are quite ubiq­ui­tous. The dipheny­lamine and diphenyl­ben­zi­dine react with many com­mon oxi­diz­ing reagents, soil, fer­til­izer, tobacco, phar­ma­ceu­ti­cals, urine, cos­met­ics, and many other com­pounds. The paraf­fin test is non-specific and is of no use in detect­ing gun shot residues. To the best of my knowl­edge, it is no longer used by crime labs.

Leave a Reply